Another separate topic. Just a point that arises out of evidence we heard on the video link. Do you remember we heard Mrs. Regan the school caretaker from Aston and Mrs. Walmsley over the video link and Mr. Banks. Mrs. Regan and Mrs. Walmsley gave their evidence over the television link from Barrow because their health was such that they could not travel to court. Mr. Bank's evidence was taken from another room in this building because of the learning difficulties that he has. The giving of evidence in that way is perfectly normal these days in circumstances of that kind. In the case of the first two witnesses it is done as a matter of convenience to avoid stresses to their health. In the case of Mr. Banks, it is designed to enable a witness like him to feel more at ease when he is giving his evidence. It is not intended to pre-judge the evidence that the witnesses give. The fact that evidence has been given in that way must not be considered as in any way prejudicial to Mr. Park. You just evaluate the evidence of those three witnesses entirely in the same manner as you consider the other witnesses who paraded into this court on the various days that we are looking at.
Now in a moment I am going to turn to my summary of the evidence, and when I do so I begin to trespass upon your area of responsibility, the facts, but before I do that, I just want to inform you of what is and is not evidence in the case. Evidence is what you heard from people in the witness box or over the video link, the exhibits which have been produced. You have got a list of those in your files, and before you came in we agreed with Counsel that the exhibits would be laid out in your jury room in due course in an orderly fashion so that you can look at them with a health warning in certain cases, but that will be looked at administratively.